A Bohemian Remedy

IMG_0228

Jay is never good in the mornings. Neither am I. Walking to school so early that even Charles Bridge is completely empty – tired and still suffering from timezone change. After several years following the American Dream, I had returned to Europe with my new family, Prague – Bohemia! Back in America, so many parents were in awe of our confidence when we walked away from modern society, bought a retro-motorhome, and immersed ourselves in a parenting utopia beyond their debt-constrained lifestyles. It just seemed like the right thing to do at the time. We were Libertarians, radical unschoolers, or just plain crazy and following dream. Basically we were broke and had been laid off as private school teachers. No, actually it all began before that. Perhaps my misguided assumption that America is what we thought is was. It was, once in the Fifties – for WASPs maybe. The very phrase, ‘Looking for the American Dream’, is now something I recognised as exactly that which it defines – ‘a dream’. A British comedian once explained why we don’t have an ‘English Dream’, “Because we’re awake!” He exclaimed. No white picket fences for us!

Jay loved the tram ride, his sister Holly was already muscling her way out of the stroller to be a part of this morning confusion of Czech commuters, a new member of this brave new world of streets and city.  Their life previously having been one of fields, trees, and rivers. Wild animals, rabbits, deer, fish, and the tourist hunters that would become our fleeting neighbours as radical-homeschooling parents on the run. The motorhome was as cosy as it was consuming – we felt almost agoraphobic, but our children embraced the bustle. Their eyes ablaze watching the traffic, buildings go by, and listening to the language and sirens. Full sensory over-ride after the calm of Snoqualmie River.

Outside the window Holly pointed with glee at Charles Bridge, recognising it as that bustling mass of tourism, statues, beggars, traders, and old men playing jazz to sell their CDs that we had walked through the day before. They don’t miss the countryside – they love the city! Prague is a world away from our homeschooling dream that had formed their personalities to deal with their new environment in a way the local, shy, commuting kids here just didn’t seem to have. “Ahoy!”, Said Jay to a child his own age. The kid just looked away, with a sort of, ‘We don’t talk in public’, look in his eyes.

Socially precocious is what I now call Jay and Holly. After spending so long mixing with children of all ages and even adults during our ‘Motorhome Diaries’ phase, they had developed skills beyond the confines of any city dweller. And, Prague is such a safe city that their happy and open manner does win some hearts. Occasionally a local, city boy will smile, wave, and respond with a look of, ‘we really can talk in public, and make new friends’. ‘The Motorhome Diaries’ is something I wanted to write. Once. That was before the disillusion that seemed to sweep across America. Before food stamps, hopelessness, and the very fact that this was no longer the Sixties. No ‘On the Road’ Bohemianism. Living as homeschoolers in an RV became a reality shock. Only once you spend a winter in one, with a frozen water supply, surrounded by meth addicts and weird ‘snowbirds’ that you suspected as being pedophiles as they try to make friends in a creepy way with your kids, do you realise how an utopian dream can become more related to ‘Breaking Bad’, than a family adventure.

The tram made it’s ‘pingy-pong’ noise before announcing the name of the next stop in Czech. A pronunciation sounding nothing like the words written on my map.

Jay had let go of the pole and flew backwards onto the deck as the tram suddenly came to a halt. “This is our stop!”, I croaked. My voice hoarse from whatever exotic cold we had all developed since the flight here. I grabbed Jay’s hand as we manipulated the stroller down the steps and into the cobblestoned road.

© 2014, Lee A. Elliott

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Wisdom of Angst

IMG_0524 copy

I feel myself beginning to continually reflect and become more emotionally consolidated lately. I may be screaming inside and want to shake some sense into those younger fools, those more naive and full of that ‘innocent stupidity’ in their life choices and aspirations that is both a danger to themselves, but also incredibly annoying to elders when it works out for them. I’m not looking forward to parenting more teenagers.

I was that type of annoying young man once, all full of himself, no qualifications, just a charming face and an improbable optimism that everything was going to be cool as long as he was nice to everyone. Worst still I had a penchant for tempting fate, like child’s finger hovering over a big red button, wondering what will happen when he presses it. Whenever I was in a foreign country I would have this sudden compulsion to not come home and just stay there to see what happened. Constantly shaking hands with the one-armed-bandit of life, now what? What comes next?

I have met enough stupid old men now to realize that wisdom is not something that automatically comes from aging alone. I’m beginning to think it comes from suffering sleepless nights as a parent, worrying over the past and anxious about the future. I think feeling old is more than just holding my unshaven, puffy face in my hands as I sit on the edge of the bed in my dressing gown. It is a sort of comical resignation to life and our inability to control it, or even find socks in the morning. I would like to buy some striped, cotton pajamas to add to this vision, and go back to bed with a cup of tea, some biscuits, and a good book.

If I ignore it, maybe time will stand still and the children will remain young forever, and I need not worry about letting them go.

© 2015, Lee A. Elliott

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Digital Soup

One day, I sat up in bed to be hit full in the face with a big, fluffy, stuffed Angry Bird. My son Jay laughed then launched another. This next one was rubber and actually hurt. He thought this was hilarious, while his sister Holly jumped up and down on the bed in glee. I frowned. I swung my feet out of bed only to plant one in an empty soup bowl. As an unschooling father, was I getting sloppy? I didn’t even make that soup, it was store bought. I took the bowl into to the kitchen as another Angry Bird hits me in the back of the head. Jay’s aim has improved incredibly I thought. Skills aside, I started to question these birds.

For a while back then, it seemed that the theme tune to Angry Birds had become the theme tune to my life. I remember once there being a time when the standard way to distract a toddler was to hand them the car keys. Now in waiting rooms, on trains, and everywhere a restless and fidgeting child can be found, so too is that theme tune. We hand them a smartphone in the same way we would have allowed them the coveted car keys. Next thing I knew, I had a one-year-old Holly able to turn the phone on, swipe and locate Angry Birds, then happily launch them in the wrong direction with a gleeful cry of, “Did it!”

It all began when I was given a car ride by a principal of a local alternative school, to my surprise, she handed her four-year-old son behind her an iPad for the journey. My own son Jay sat next to him enthralled. Soon I felt like I was in a car with Black Panther’s in the back planning a drive-by shooting. “Kill the pigs, kill the pigs!” they chanted to that incessant tune. As cool as it seemed having a little one using this technology, there was just something not quite right with these birds. Well, first of all these birds are ‘angry’. The gloating pigs have stolen their eggs, occupy tall buildings, have leaders with gold crowns, and even golden eggs. The aim of the game is to launch these birds on suicide attacks (they all die once launched) at the buildings until they destroy them, and all the pigs are dead. Shades of 9/11 in abstract cartoon form I thought. Today, Angry Birds frown at us from lunch boxes, and all kinds of merchandise everywhere. Meanwhile Jay had started throwing things around indoors with a “Yee-ha!”

I placed the bowl in the sink, the empty soup carton stood on the counter staring at me. I hadn’t even checked the ingredients when I bought it – looking at the salt content and the list of unknown additives I would never add to my own vegetable soup – I had an epiphany. I don’t want my children eating processed food all the time, but I am not going to ban them from eating anything store bought because of this. I want them to eat the right amount of nutritious food, just as I want them to have access the right amount of appropriate technology. I needed to think more about quantity, content, and my children’s developmental needs – whether I am feeding their bodies with food, or their minds with new technology.

For many children (more than you may imagine) Angry Birds is basically their first computer game experience. Frowns, anger, gloating, suicide attacks, bombs, death, and destruction. While it seems obvious to question the influence a ‘shoot-them-up’ game using virtual assault rifles may have on an ‘angry’ teenager, these fluffy birds pass under most parent’s radar. I can’t help suspecting that, comparatively, this is just as worrying. As innocent as Teletubbies, or a McDonald’s Happy Meal toy may appear, they contain veiled motifs and agendas. Am I over thinking this? Am I just turning into a ‘helicopter dad’?

Children learn impressive skills on these devices, and this technology is here to stay. But often we as parents fail to think about the content, or consider some and simply reject all. When I first came to America, I heard parents talking about limiting ‘screen time’ – only when I began to write this article, did I look up the phrase and discover it was coined by Lisa Guernsey in her book of the same name. Talking about limiting screen time alone misses her whole point. What Guernsey refers to as, “the three C’s” (Content, Context, and the individual Child) reflected my evolving thoughts as a father on our own children’s use of these interactive technologies, and indeed all forms of digital entertainment. Throwing it all into one big bag to judge is like limiting reading time regardless of subject matter, or how it is being consumed, and the individual child’s needs, and usage.

As I lounge about on a laptop writing this, my wife may sometimes be forgiven for assuming I am just randomly surfing the internet, or wasting time on FaceBook. A teenager sitting indoors on their computer is judged in a completely different way as one sitting indoors reading. We don’t want them surfing the dark under belly of the internet, or playing violent video games, but equally we don’t want them reading, Fifty Shades of Grey, or The Anarchist’s Cook Book. It is not time limits nor access that are as important as being aware as a parent, and proactive and involved in inspiring quality content. I see too many parents limiting ‘screen time’ with good intention only to allow Angry Birds or Sponge Bob Squarepants as that ‘screen time’ content. Like offering fast food as a treat after eating so healthily all week.

As a young Montessori facilitator in the early nineties, I remember the big fanfare over ‘multi-media’ in the news and how this would change education. I scoffed along with my colleagues over the idea that these crude and cartoon-like activities could be anything but an amusing distraction from the hands-on learning we inspired. I still do, but there was something I felt was wrong by completely denying access to computers to young students that didn’t sit well. To this day my elderly father is still of a certain mind that takes pride in declaring, “I don’t know how to use computers, don’t care for them”. Which is a shame as it would be so nice if he could Skype with his grandchildren. I couldn’t help thinking about Mr. Wormwood from Roald Dahl’s Matilda as he rejects his daughter’s passion for books. The main reason was that Mr. Wormwood felt threatened, he was illiterate just as the most staunch teachers I met who rejected this new media, tended on the whole to be computer illiterate. I don’t mean that in an insulting way, if today at age fifty I was told that a pair of glasses invented by a search engine would change education – I would equally laugh. Then I see in today’s news that all students in LA are being provided with iPads. I can imagine it now, “Okay class, if you would please take notes from the board”, say’s the teacher as they all lift up their iPads and take a photo.

My first thoughtful inclusion of computers in a prepared learning environment for children of Jay’s age involved the hands-on use of this new technology rather than delivered content. I had a small monochrome screen, simple keyboard, and a mouse. I wrote lowercase letters in the same style as they were learning, and stuck them over the uppercase letters of the keyboard (blacking out all the rest). They would turn the computer on, click on an empty document (set to a large italic font), and type the letters they had just written by hand. That was over twenty-years ago. Now my oldest children are teenagers and adults.

My son Jay has recently turned four, he is now using a laptop and already sees his iPad as passé. When I was his age I hadn’t even used an Etch-A-Sketch, as an emergent teen I was happy playing Pong. As I write this, he is next to me now, we are both relaxed, lying on our fronts, legs twirling in the air behind us, tapping away at our screens. I am sure he sees the laptop as a more mature tool, more complex, with a keyboard, trackpad, and demanding higher dexterity. He basically sees me on one and considers it more grown up. He is learning independently, I just try to ensure he is in a virtual environment that is positive.

Today, I see digital media as a rich, over-cooked soup I once made. A soup with some nasty burned in flavors at the bottom of a pot that will never scrape clean, and some unappealing scum on the surface that at first sight would put you off feeding any to your children altogether. As my children age, I know I will never keep up, but I can initially allow them a structured freedom in which they can find themselves. Digital technology has evolved at such a pace! I find I am still learning as a worrying parent and thoughtful advocate. I do not believe in excluding computers from our children’s lives, but I do believe that as a parent I need to be more involved.

Know now that as our children become full-on teenagers, we are not going to be able to retain full control of their internet use, if any. As long as they live with us, we can restrict their computer access, ban them from using FaceBook, lecture them, or spy on their internet history, but the best we will achieve by this is to push them into becoming secretive. Watching our children grow, it is easy to feel like a tortoise watching the hare in the distance as it runs head first into this primeval digital soup. That scares us as caring parents as much as seeing them leave home will later. Helping them learn to become safe, wise, and selective digital citizens is something we need to inspire early on.

Maybe I was getting above myself, but I couldn’t help reaching out to the very woman who coined the phrase ‘screen time’ to help me consolidate my own ideas and allow me to either critique myself, or feel encouraged. To my delight, Lisa Guernsey responded to my emails asking for her current thoughts on what she sees as both negative and positive about this new media. It is unsurprising that using ‘screen time’ as a babysitter free from adult involvement is something we both were against. Replacing human interaction with digital and screen activity will always be a poor second cousin to real life. However, there is a cross-over that is important, and part of a journey that we can help instill, and inspire, but inevitably take a back seat on as our children grow beyond us. Screen media that utilizes the virtual and digital, as an extension, or promoter of real-life experiences can be hugely rewarding and positive.

Sometimes as an homeschooling father I feel a tinge of guilt as I joined my children in playing computer games. As a progressive unschooler, I don’t. I join my children in the ‘digital soup’ as a mentor and wise companion, and will use our experiences to act as springboards into real-life action. For example, we wanted to make vegetable soup and along with Jay, searched various cooking sites together and watched a few videos. We made a list and visited the local farmer’s market.

Lisa Guernsey went further still in sharing her current attitudes, advocating what she referred to as, “blended online and offline experiences that enable children to see connections and that continue to pique their curiosity.” An example being their taking photographs (or video) of what is around them in their own physical spaces, and then talking about or annotating them. Computers, screens, and all new technology should be an extension of our real-life experiences, not replace them. But ‘blended’.

Jay’s latest fascination is Minecraft. In Sweden this creative and interactive program is now actually part of their national curriculum. He builds and designs islands, houses (sometimes extremely strange houses), and has begun recreating them with Lego. We have recently returned from the farmer’s market with the results of his shopping list (that he created in amusing picture form).

As I finish writing this, I know that however thoughtful I am, I remain far from being the perfect parent or expert on this. I look at Jay and know one sentence that is always guaranteed to have him drop his technology and eagerly engage in the real world. “Jay, can you help me cook?” With some parsley, carrots, leeks, celery, and just a few potatoes to chop, Jay and I head to the kitchen to make vegetable soup. While Jay tackles the vegetables, I put some water on to boil. I eye-up the ingredients on the back of a packet of stock cubes. Oh dear, we really need to start making our own stock again, I thought.  While I question this content, Jay reminds me what we need to do next from his recollections of Jamie Oliver’s recipe. Meanwhile, I hear a familiar tune approach as Holly enters the kitchen with her Angry Birds, I was wondering where my phone went!

© 2013, Lee A. Elliott. First published in Home Education Magazine, 2013.

https://leeaelliott.wordpress.com/wp-admin/edit-comments.php

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Man About the House

photo-1 copy

The alarm didn’t go off. In fact the alarm hasn’t gone off since I can remember. This morning I wake up to the sound of zombies groaning, “We’re coming.” My son Jay, age three, is at the foot of the bed with his iPad playing ‘Plants vs. Zombies’. Hardly sounds educational, and breakfast has been prepared by my one year-old daughter Holly––some squished banana which she proudly serves by pushing it in my mouth before I have even opened my eyes.

Jay has now plugged his iPad in to recharge, and has wandered into the kitchen with Holly in tow. I imagine what my mother-in-law might have said if she could see me at this moment: “Look at yourself! You might call laying in bed ‘radical unschooling’, I call it not bothering, and bad parenting! Leaving your children to fend for themselves! You should be ashamed of yourself! Man up and get a job! They should be at school!” I pull up the duvet and snuggle into my pillow. Meanwhile, I hear Jay in the kitchen pouring milk for his sister with limited spillage. He even remembers to shut the fridge door this time in spite of the distraction of Holly cleaning up the mess by unrolling practically all that remains of the kitchen towels. Yes! I am sure even social workers would be concerned by this apparently obvious parental neglect. An unshaven man in bed, seemingly unconcerned about his children.

Holly brings me a beaker of milk to drink, which I find quite reviving as she spills it over my face. With a stretch and a big, groaning man yawn, I give her a hug and thank her, before sitting up and wiping squished banana from my lips.

Now, a modern day Mary Poppins would have drawn the curtains at first light, before waking us all with that inexplicable cartoon voice that some people use when addressing children. Then she would brush their hair, scrub them up and dress them, before strapping Holly in a highchair and spoon feeding her. Jay having been placed in front of a bowl of freshly made oatmeal already waiting for him at the table, and bibs all around! She would most certainly also have prepared lessons and activities for the day.

However, to see how independent and engaged in their environment my children are––‘neglected’ is the last word that describes them. I don’t feel being a good parent is all about doing everything for your children. You should care for and protect your children, but they need and want to become independent, self-directed learners. If that means I have to sleep in with breakfast in bed (even if it is just a mush of banana with a splash of milk), I am ready!

I plod towards the bathroom for a shave, inviting them in to brush their own teeth once Jay has finished his apple. I have no idea what we’ll learn today! Well, we certainly won’t be singing the alphabet song, that’s for sure. Names for letters? What nonsense! You try sounding out the simplest of three letter phonetic words armed with only the names of uppercase letters sung in order to the tune of ‘Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star’. We may as well invent new symbols for numbers to teach them that would look only vaguely like the numerical symbols they would later need to recognize. I could hang a frieze on the wall depicting bold numbers in order from one to ten, and watch them count to ten by pointing at the symbols in turn. My mother-in-law would be impressed. She may even believe that I have taught her grandchildren to count. Let’s just hope she doesn’t point to number nine and ask them what it is, as they would have to start counting from the beginning again in order to name it.

It is important to stand back sometimes and question why we do things in certain ways, and whether they are the best approaches. Families who choose to unschool do just that by their very decision to embark on that journey. However, it is often the ‘doing things’ that stand in the way, particularly on the part of the parent. Equally, teachers who choose to homeschool can have great difficulty letting go of a tendency to lead from the top, with a goal and outcome being targeted within a prepared and limited learning experience. Unschooling relies on a prepared and inspiring home environment that can create a spark of curiosity that can take learning in any direction, at any moment.

Jay is now busy choosing his clothes and dressing himself, while Holly attempts to do the same, but just ends up creating a hat out of her favorite dress. She then proudly parades around the bedroom like it is the most unique fashion statement ever. I help her find an opening for her head and leave her to push her own hands through the sleeves.

Children from impoverished villages with no schooling develop life skills beyond their years, apparently. Or do they? Their life skills are developed, but beyond their years? I don’t think so. Their motivation to engage in their environment is no different from any child’s. A caring parent, watching a random cable channel, may feel sorry, seeing these poor children, ‘forced to grow-up’, having to fend for themselves in such a village, as they work alongside their mothers pounding grain. While that parent watches TV, their own child sits safely caged in a playpen behind them, surrounded by loudly colored plastic things that squeak. There has to be a middle ground where our children are neither neglected nor pampered, but enabled and trusted to take appropriate risks. When a child first learns to stand and reaches out for the objects they see us using everyday, those objects are moved away––remote controls, smart phones, eyeglasses, and anything that can possibly be spilled on a beige carpet. They are gathered in the center of the table, or retreat to higher ground. But, really? Is a spillage so bad if it helps fine tune a toddler’s motor skills and balance? It will have to happen one day!

My older children are now at middle school age and beyond. When they were further along the journey that their younger siblings, Jay and Holly, have begun, their projects were of their own choosing, often building from a chance moment, thought or discovery such as an unusual insect, a collection of shells from a morning stroll along the shore, or a sudden and inexplicable desire to see how tall a structure can be made with uncooked spaghetti and play dough. They would always be active, engaged, and learning. I do admit that my hand was often secretly behind many chance discoveries, and by stealth may have helped guide the direction a child-initiated project they may take. But mostly it was all about just being there––supportive, knowing when to help and when to stand back. And allowing them to learn through their own enthusiasm and direction, even if I did float about the house leaving interesting things around by chance, with a ‘Willy Wonka’ glint in my eye.

We like our children to believe that they can do anything or become anyone, that the ‘world is their oyster’, just waiting for them to make their choices. Many believe that a child’s efforts at school and their grades will define who they will become. Personally, I dropped out of a London school, leaving home at age 16, with nothing but a low grade qualification in Art and a bad attitude. The teachers were on strike, race riots and high unemployment rates that characterized Thatcher Britain were in play. Well, my world was more like a cheap hotdog; having a taste of oyster was simply not on the menu. We do have free will and choice, but you try ordering oysters Rockefeller at a hotdog stand. Even Art School was out of the question, funding only being available for core subjects. I ate the hotdog and left England for Paris, with mustard on my chin and greasy fingers. I was soon to discover that my French teacher had empowered me with something quite unexpected––the ability to sound completely stupid! Even if the Parisians could decipher something intelligible from me, I must have sounded like I still had half a hotdog in my mouth as I struggled to speak a bad version of the type of French not heard since top hats were fashionable.

With no training, and after seven years, I could speak and understand real French. I also had employment, making a good show of teaching English. I had simply observed, emulated, and absorbed skills from my new environment that the education system had failed to instill in me. On reflection, a seed had been sown that would grow to represent my attitude towards education and learning, altogether. The irony was that I, now a teacher, was employing the same approach and methods that had failed me.

Then, one day, by chance I found my oyster in the form of a charming 50 year-old man who looked 30. He was the same age as my tired father, but with a sparkle in his eye. And he had an inspiring passion for life that drew me to provincial France to join him, where, under his mentorship, I lived on a micro farm which hosted troubled youth from inner city Marseille. Along with this mixed age group of children and teenagers we rode horses, cared for animals, planted, cooked, and gathered sacks of lavender to distill into essential oil.

While there, I learned about Rudolf Steiner and Maria Montessori, their many influences, and how my mentor had drawn on their individual philosophies to create a learning experience I had never imagined could exist. Angry, unteachable teenagers became confident young men around me as we worked together on the farm, rather than us working on them. They wrote because they had experiences they wanted to write home about, they learned math through the need to know how much wood was required to build a new fence, or how we should price our herbs, essential oils, and goat cheese at the local market. We were basically unschooling, but I didn’t know it. At the time my father thought I was a beatnik just loafing around the French countryside, while my mother was convinced I had joined a cult. I just knew that this felt right, it worked, and I wanted to know more about alternative education.

By the end of the summer I had decided to study the Montessori method. It could easily have been Waldorf that I chose, but I was offered an internship in a Swedish Montessori school. Six years later I held a full complement of Montessori credentials, covering birth to middle school, and ran my own private school. Licensing laws, accounting, inspections, liability insurance, the stuffy world of Montessori associations and accreditations––I was soon spending as much time administering the school as being with the children. I may have been an established Montessori teacher but I was no businessman. Also, I didn’t have a recognized teaching degree––something that new licensing criteria was poised to demand. I worked hard to gain a Bachelor of Education and public school teaching credentials. Then, one day, I woke to my alarm clock, only to realize that the world that was supposed to be my oyster, was suddenly smelling of hotdog again. My ‘clients’ were now wealthy, pushy parents more interested in elitism and hothousing their children than joining a diverse community of learners. I may have been running an alternative school that shared many motifs with the philosophies of the man who first inspired me, but I had become a teacher in a school.

I threw it all up in the air and moved to an island in New Zealand to unschool my three oldest children. My passion was to recreate for them the learning environment that had first inspired me. This struck a chord with the local homeschoolers and like-minded parents on the island. I considered myself a sort of rebel, a Montessorian unschooler. Much of the underlying philosophy behind Montessori complimented my approach. And best of all, homeschooling groups were free from the obligation to follow the national curriculum in New Zealand, and could operate unlicensed. I had created an unschooling community in which our children flourished.

I have since emigrated to America and have two more beautiful children, and a new passion. I now consider myself a radical unschooler. My mother-in-law may not understand, and as a man, I may be in a minority by committing to a family lifestyle over following my career. After 23 years in education, I no longer consider myself a teacher. I am simply a father with a knowing twinkle in his eye.

It is very easy for some to remain caught up in preconceptions of what a father should be for his children. There are these Kodachrome images of fathers playing ball in the garden with their sons, buying him a super hero comic as a treat, or with their daughters on their knees, sitting on a rocking chair and reading a book about princesses. These images have been reinforced in popular culture, a throwback from an imagined world where the man goes out to work, returning to spend a moment of ‘quality time’ with the kids while the aproned woman cooks dinner. Although this sounds like a white picket fence view of a family in the 1950s, gender roles are still unintentionally asserted.

Paradoxically, the majority of homeschooling families involve a nurturing mother at home and a man in employment to make this financially possible. Interestingly, a child is also far more likely to be taught by a man at school than learn alongside one at home.

I remember my older children watching a scene from a TV show that involved blood one evening. I explained how this was fake blood, and of course these are actors. Next thing I know, we are in the kitchen making fake blood from corn syrup and food coloring. They act out the scene and film it. We spend the rest of the evening finding out how movies are made, coming up with ideas, storyboarding, and staying up late into the night editing their footage with sound effects and background ambience. Yes, we slept in late the next day, but my older children became able to question what they see on television and in the movies. They began writing scripts and making props––most amusing was when they drank blue Gatorade from a (throughly cleaned) Windex bottle, almost giving my mother-in-law a heart attack.

Deciding to become radical unschoolers as a family was not really something we ever planned, we never really even thought about it. In many ways, thinking about it and planning it goes against the natural form it should take. Not parent-led, nor child-centered, just a family, all equally involved in day-to-day living. We’re learning through action and involvement together as a family.

At this early stage most of Jay and Holly’s learning comes from cooking, creativity, and exploring the outside world. I am wondering what they will do with the cardboard boxes, poster tubes, and paper tape that somehow appeared in the main room overnight. How did that stuff get there?

This year I turn 50 and I have that sparkle in my eye. We may be poor, but as Jay stands next to me now, counting out the eggs he is about to cook for his mother, I decide that tonight we will eat oysters Rockefeller. Having the entire family together all day, every day, as I watch them learn and grow, and having a banana squished in my face every morning, is all I need to feel like the richest man in the world.

© 2013, Lee A. Elliott. First published in Home Education Magazine, 2013.

https://leeaelliott.wordpress.com/wp-admin/edit-comments.php

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment